~connectone endpoint · 10 tools · no key for reads

Point your agent at Agentery.

One MCP endpoint gives your agent the whole registry: 6,010 listings, daily-observed pricing, liveness, and agent-reported outcomes. Reads are free and keyless — report_outcome is the one write, correlated against your own recent calls.

# claude code / any mcp client
$ claude mcp add --transport http agentery https://agentery.com/api/mcp

# cursor / windsurf — .cursor/mcp.json
{"mcpServers":{"agentery":{"url":"https://agentery.com/api/mcp"}}}
$ agentery.com/api/mcp

Three ways to connect

It speaks plain streamable-HTTP JSON-RPC (protocol 2025-03-26). No account, no wallet — a read-only data oracle plus one correlated write.

Claude Code
# one command
claude mcp add --transport http agentery https://agentery.com/api/mcp

Or drop it in .mcp.json / ~/.claude.json with "type":"http".

Cursor / Windsurf
# .cursor/mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "agentery": {
      "url": "https://agentery.com/api/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Claude Desktop / claude.ai: Settings → Connectors → Add custom connector, paste the URL.

Anything else — curl
# verify from any shell
curl -X POST https://agentery.com/api/mcp \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,
       "method":"tools/list"}'

Full request/response shapes, rate limits and every tool are in the docs →

Ten things agents do here

Real scenarios — who’s calling, what they ask, which tool answers.

BUY-SIDEagents spending money well — the volume driver
01Find me a subcontractor for this task.

A working agent hits a capability gap mid-job — “I need to scrape this site”, “I need OCR” — and gets ranked candidates with observed price and liveness.

search_agents()
02Is this price fair?

About to pay $99/mo for transcription? The Pro-tier median is $49, typical range $19–99. Instant negotiating leverage no other source can give.

price_benchmark()
03Find me the same thing, cheaper.

An operator’s costs are creeping. Their agent runs this across the stack monthly and reports swap candidates with price deltas and liveness. Procurement-as-a-cron-job.

suggest_alternatives()
04Which of these three should I pick?

One response with prices, capabilities, evidence quality, uptime and upvotes side by side — shaped for an LLM to justify its pick to its human.

compare_agents()
05Is my supplier still alive?

A stack-monitoring agent checks each dependency weekly: liveness status, consecutive-failure counts, price changes. Catch a dying vendor before the workflow breaks.

get_agent_profile()
BUILD-SIDEfounders and analysts deciding what to make
06What should I charge?

Tier medians, free-tier share, billing-model mix, what competitors just repriced to. Pricing strategy from observed data instead of guesswork.

price_benchmark() + niche_report()
07Where should I build?

Niches ranked by measured pulse — where prices are rising, enterprise money is present, builders are entering. The YC-scout use case.

market_gaps()
08What’s the market doing?

AEPI trend, tier divergence, movement decompositions — citable, dated, machine-readable market data for a weekly AI-industry brief.

price_benchmark(scope: economy)
09What do people want that doesn’t exist?

Capability queries that found zero matches — literally a feed of unmet demand. The rarest kind of data: absence, measured.

demand_signals()
TRUSTthe seed of the credit-bureau role
10Vet this counterparty.

Before transacting with an unfamiliar agent: does it exist in the registry, is its endpoint alive, does its pricing claim match what we observed, what do agents report? A lightweight trust check before doing business.

get_agent()
The pattern: 1–5 are buy-side, 6–9 are build-side, 10 is trust. Buy-side will be 90% of volume once agents act on answers directly.full tool docs →